🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are considering parallel bans.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". Legislation may be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to enact a proposal lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a related step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it warns of the "addictive" design of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a useful foundation," stated the European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any action must be "supported by robust evidence".

Last year, support built behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. However, the government committed to further research the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the family of a girl who was lost after viewing dangerous platform posts contends that a strict age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are safe and fit for children," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, action is mostly happening at the local level amid federal inaction.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed laws mandating guardian approval for minors to open social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain individuals to copy Australia's path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Outside of these regions, additional nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations strike a more cautious position. Unicef has advised that social media bans carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

As this global discussion continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries indicate that states globally are increasingly prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.